Low-code is an approach to development that requires minimal custom coding. It uses a modular framework and pre-built components to create applications, rather than writing code from scratch.
The main difference is the level of human intervention. Low-code allows developers to add custom code and modify built-in code, while no-code relies solely on pre-built configurations without the ability to add custom code.
Low-code platforms can be used to build a wide variety of web and mobile applications, from simple tools to sophisticated enterprise apps. With Slingr, you can also build on-premises deployments that run on your business’ machines.
Key benefits include faster development, lower costs, easier long-term support, and a robust integration ecosystem that makes it easy to work with 3rd party tools.
Low-code has context agnostic and can be utilized across a variety of industries, but many of our clients are in manufacturing, healthcare, and laboratory sciences.
No, low-code won't make developers obsolete. It allows developers to focus on more complex tasks by eliminating routine work. In many cases, managing the software architecture and testing edge case utility requires a professional engineer, even for a low-code platform like Slingr.
Yes, Slingr is internally HIPAA-compliant and is designed to facilitate the easy construction of HIPAA-compliant systems.
Although security is always dependent on implementation and maintenance practices, Slingr's platform is SOC2-certified and we are constantly reviewing and expanding our security measures to make your applications safer.
Yes, Slingr has a robust set of integration tools to work with API-enabled 3rd party tools and software.
Low-code is context agnostic, but some businesses may not benefit from using low-code. Low-code may not be ideal for businesses that need close control over their cloud provider, low-level code, or other infrastructural details that are typically handled by the low-code vendor. The majority of businesses do not need such a deep level of control.
No, low-code is typically more cost effective than custom coding.